Devil's advocate takes an independent critical questioning stance on someone else's foresight work arguing the unpopular side of the case and assuming the most negative possible perspective.
Uses of the method
Benefits
Disadvantages
Steps to complete
- sources of uncertainty
- flaws in the process
- challengeable assumptions
- incorrect diagnoses
- evidence anomalies
- critical information gaps
- ill-considered external environmental factors
- missing cultural considerations
- misleading evidence deriving from deceptions
Collaboration
This method and your response can be shared with other members or kept private using the 'Privacy' field and through the 'Tag', 'Report' and 'Forum' functionalities. Use 'Tag' and/or 'Report' to aggregate your analyzes, or add a 'Forum' to ask others where they agree/disagree and encourage them to make their own analysis from their unique vantage point.
Click the 'Invite tab to send invitations to other members or non-members (colleagues, external experts etc.) to ask for their input. You can whether or not you want anonymous responses. These can be viewed and exported within the Responses tab.
Further reference
Contact us
Even with all the advice and tools we have provided here starting a foresight project from scratch can be a daunting prospect to a beginner. Let us know if you need help with this method or want a group facilitation exercise or full project or program carrying out by us. We promise to leave behind more internal knowledgeable people who can expand your initiative for better organizational performance.
Contact us today for a free discussion on your needs.
Are there other enhancements or new methods you would like to see here? Let us know and we will do our best to respond with a solution quickly.
Copyright
Some rights reserved. This particular part of the website is licensed under a Creative Commons License.